Paper detail

L-systems for Measuring Repetitiveness*

An L-system (for lossless compression) is a CPD0L-system extended with two parameters $d$ and $n$, which determines unambiguously a string $w = τ(φ^d(s))[1:n]$, where $φ$ is the morphism of the system, $s$ is its axiom, and $τ$ is its coding. The length of the shortest description of an L-system generating $w$ is known as $\ell$, and is arguably a relevant measure of repetitiveness that builds on the self-similarities that arise in the sequence. In this paper we deepen the study of the measure $\ell$ and its relation with $δ$, a better established lower bound that builds on substring complexity. Our results show that $\ell$ and $δ$ are largely orthogonal, in the sense that one can be much larger than the other depending on the case. This suggests that both sources of repetitiveness are mostly unrelated. We also show that the recently introduced NU-systems, which combine the capabilities of L-systems with bidirectional macro-schemes, can be asymptotically strictly smaller than both mechanisms, which makes the size $ν$ of the smallest NU-system the unique smallest reachable repetitiveness measure to date.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.