Paper detail

L$\ddot{u}$der rule, von Neumann rule and Cirelson's bound of Bell CHSH inequality

In [PRL, 113, 050401 (2014)] the authors have shown that instead of L$\ddot{u}$der rule, if degeneracy breaking von Neumann projection rule is adopted for state reduction, the quantum value of three-time Leggett-Garg inequality can exceed it's L$\ddot{u}$ders bound. Such violation of L$\ddot{u}$ders bound may even approach algebraic maximum of the inequality in the asymptotic limit of system size. They also claim that for Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) inequality such violation of L$\ddot{u}$ders bound (known as Cirelson's bound) cannot be obtained even when the measurement is performed sequentially first by Alice followed by Bob. In this paper, we have shown that if von Neumann projection rule is used, quantum bound of CHSH inequality exceeds it's Cirelson's bound and may also reach its algebraic maximum four. This thus provide a strong objection regarding the viability of von Neumann rule as a valid state reduction rule. Further, we pointed out that the violation of Cirelson's bound occurs due to the injection of additional quantum non-locality by the act of implementing von Neumann measurement rule.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.