Paper detail

Kramers-Kronig Relations for Nonlinear Rheology: 2. Validation of Medium Amplitude Oscillatory Shear (MAOS) Measurements

The frequency dependence of third-harmonic medium amplitude oscillatory shear (MAOS) modulus $G_{33}^{*}(ω)$ provides insight into material behavior and microstructure in the asymptotically nonlinear regime. Motivated by the difficulty in the measurement of MAOS moduli, we propose a test for data validation based on nonlinear Kramers-Kronig relations. We extend the approach used to assess the consistency of linear viscoelastic data by expressing the real and imaginary parts of $G_{33}^{*}(ω)$ as a linear combination of Maxwell elements: the functional form for the MAOS kernels is inspired by time-strain separability (TSS). We propose a statistical fitting technique called the SMEL test, which works well on a broad range of materials and models including those that do not obey TSS. It successfully copes with experimental data that are noisy, or confined to a limited frequency range. When Maxwell modes obtained from the SMEL test are used to predict the first-harmonic MAOS modulus $G_{31}^{*}$, it is possible to identify the range of timescales over which a material exhibits TSS.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.