Kpc-scale Radio Structure in z∼0.25z\sim0.25 Radio-Quiet QSOs

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Abstract

We present analysis of a homogeneous, optically selected, volume-limited (0.2<z<0.30.2<z<0.3) sample of 128 radio-quiet quasi-stellar objects (QSOs) recently observed at 6 GHz with the Very Large Array (VLA) in A-configuration (∼0.33′′\sim0.33'' resolution). We compare these new results to earlier (2010--2011) 6-GHz observations with the VLA in C-configuration (∼3.5′′\sim3.5''). While all of these radio-quiet QSOs (RQQs) were unresolved on a 3.5′′3.5'' scale (∼\sim14 kpc at z=0.25z=0.25), we resolve notable complex sub-galactic structures in about half of the RQQs at 0.33′′0.33'' resolution (∼\sim1.3 kpc at z=0.25z=0.25). By comparison of flux density measurements between the two sets of observations, we demonstrate that significant sub-galactic-scale radio structure is present in at least 70% of the RQQ population, and that the central component accounts for an average of ≈\approx65% of the total detected radio power. One RQQ, J0935+4819, shows striking symmetric, double-lobed morphology, and appears to be the first identified example of a radio-quiet\mathrm{\textit{quiet}} QSO with FR II type morphology on ∼\simarcsec scale (projected size of ≳6\gtrsim6 kpc). In addition to revealing RQQ sub-galactic morphology, we employ counterparts from legacy (FIRST at 1.4 GHz) and recent (VLA Sky Survey at 3 GHz) VLA surveys to investigate radio spectral indices and potential variability over decades-long timescales for a subset of the RQQs, and for the cores of radio-intermediate and -loud sources in the parent sample of 178 QSOs. These results support the growing notion that the RQQ population is not a monolithic phenomenon, but instead consists of a mixture of mainly starburst-powered and jet-powered galaxies.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.