Paper detail

Koopmans' condition in self-interaction corrected density functional theory

We investigate from a practitioner's point of view the computation of the ionization potential (IP) within density functional theory (DFT). DFT with (semi-)local energy-density functionals is plagued by a self-interaction error which hampers the computation of IP from the single-particle energy of the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO). The problem may be cured by a self interaction correction (SIC) for which there exist various approximate treatments. We compare the performance of the SIC proposed by Perdew and Zunger with the very simple average-density SIC (ADSIC) for a large variety of atoms and molecules up to larger systems as carbon rings and chains. Both approaches to SIC provide a large improvement to the quality of the IP if calculated from the HOMO level. The surprising result is that the simple ADSIC performs even better than the original Perdew-Zunger SIC (PZSIC) in the majority of the studied cases.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.