Paper detail

Know When to Persist: Deriving Value from a Stream Buffer

We consider \textsc{Persistence}, a new online problem concerning optimizing weighted observations in a stream of data when the observer has limited buffer capacity. A stream of weighted items arrive one at a time at the entrance of a buffer with two holding locations. A processor (or observer) can process (observe) an item at the buffer location it chooses, deriving this way the weight of the observed item as profit. The main constraint is that the processor can only move {\em synchronously} with the item stream; as a result, moving from the end of the buffer to the entrance, it crosses paths with the item already there, and will never have the chance to process or even identify it. \textsc{Persistence}\ is the online problem of scheduling the processor movements through the buffer so that its total derived value is maximized under this constraint. We study the performance of the straight-forward heuristic {\em Threshold}, i.e., forcing the processor to "follow" an item through the whole buffer only if its value is above a threshold. We analyze both the optimal offline and Threshold algorithms in case the input stream is a random permutation, or its items are iid valued. We show that in both cases the competitive ratio achieved by the Threshold algorithm is at least $2/3$ when the only statistical knowledge of the items is the median of all possible values. We generalize our results by showing that Threshold, equipped with some minimal statistical advice about the input, achieves competitive ratios in the whole spectrum between $2/3$ and $1$, following the variation of a newly defined density-like measure of the input. This result is a significant improvement over the case of arbitrary input streams, since in this case we show that no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio better than $1/2$.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.