Paper detail

Knock-on processes in superfluid vortex avalanches and pulsar glitch statistics

A framework is presented for a statistical theory of neutron star glitches, motivated by the results emerging from recent Gross-Pitaevskii simulations of pinned, decelerating quantum condensates. It is shown that the observed glitch size distributions cannot be reproduced if superfluid vortices unpin independently via a Poisson process; the central limit theorem yields a narrow Gaussian for the size distribution, instead of the broad, power-law tail observed. This conclusion is not altered fundamentally when a range of pinning potentials is included, which leads to excavation of the potential distribution of occupied sites, vortex accumulation at strong pinning sites, and hence the occasional, abnormally large glitch. Knock-on processes are therefore needed to make the unpinning rate of a vortex conditional on the pinning state of its near and/or remote neighbours, so that the Gaussian size distributions resulting generically from the central limit theorem are avoided. At least two knock-on processes, nearest- neighbour proximity knock-on and remote acoustic knock-on, are clearly evident in the Gross-Pitaevskii simulation output. It is shown that scale-invariant (i.e. power-law) vortex avalanches occur when knock-on is included, provided that two specific relations hold between the temperature and spin-down torque. This fine tuning is unlikely in an astronomical setting, leaving the overall problem partly unsolved. A state-dependent Poisson formalism is presented which will form the basis of future studies in this area.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.