Paper detail

Klasifikasi Komponen Argumen Secara Otomatis pada Dokumen Teks berbentuk Esai Argumentatif

By automatically recognize argument component, essay writers can do some inspections to texts that they have written. It will assist essay scoring process objectively and precisely because essay grader is able to see how well the argument components are constructed. Some reseachers have tried to do argument detection and classification along with its implementation in some domains. The common approach is by doing feature extraction to the text. Generally, the features are structural, lexical, syntactic, indicator, and contextual. In this research, we add new feature to the existing features. It adopts keywords list by Knott and Dale (1993). The experiment result shows the argument classification achieves 72.45% accuracy. Moreover, we still get the same accuracy without the keyword lists. This concludes that the keyword lists do not affect significantly to the features. All features are still weak to classify major claim and claim, so we need other features which are useful to differentiate those two kind of argument components.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.