Paper detail

Klapdor's claim for the observation of the neutrinoless double beta-decay of Ge-76. Analysis and corrections

Heidelberg-Moscow Collaboration experimental data [1-4] with the claim for the observation of the neutrinoless double beta-decay of Ge-76 has been carefully analyzed. The analysis gave an evidence that the observed 2039 kev line in the full spectrum was produced by overlapping of three unresolved peaks: ~2035.5 kev, ~2037.5 kev and ~2039.5 kev. It was indicated that the 2035.5 kev and 2039.5 kev peaks were produced by the double-coincidences of gamma-quanta in the detectors. Existence of the two background gamma-peaks at ~2035.5 kev and ~2039.5 kev was confirmed by an analysis of the background measurements with low-background Ge detectors with an active shielding [5-7]. The 2037.5 kev line could be the expected 2β0ν-decay transition of 76Ge according to the results of the improved pulse-shape analysis. Position of the line, 2037.56+/-0.56(stat)+/-1.2(syst) kev [4], was slightly below the expected, E2β=2039.0+/-0.05 kev [8], but still within a limit for poor statistics. The most accurate value of its intensity was extracted from the 51.39 kg \cdot y data with PSA: number of events 12.4+/-3.7 and T1/2=1.98 \cdot 1025 years [2,3].

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.