Paper detail

Kink Oscillations of a Curved, Gravitationally Stratified Coronal Loop

Loops of magnetic field in the corona are observed to oscillate and these oscillations have been posited to be the superposition of resonant kink waves. To date, most analyses of these oscillations have concentrated on calculating the frequency shifts that result from spatial variation in the kink wave speed. Further, most have ignored gravity and treated the loop as a straight tube. Here we ignore spatial variation in the wave speed, but self-consistently include the effects of gravity and loop curvature in both the equilibrium loop model and in the wave equation. We model a coronal loop as an isolated, thin, magnetic fibril that is anchored at two points in the photosphere. The equilibrium shape of the loop is determined by a balance between magnetic buoyancy and magnetic tension, which is characterized by a Magnetic Bond Number ε, that is typically small |ε| << 1. This balance produces a loop that has a variable radius of curvature. The resonant kink waves of such a loop come in two polarizations that are decoupled from each other: waves with motion completely within the plane of the loop (normal oscillations) and waves with motions that are completely horizontal, perpendicular to the plane of the loop (binormal oscillations). We solve for the eigensolutions of both polarizations using perturbation theory for small Magnetic Bond Number. For modes of the same order, normal oscillations have smaller eigenfrequencies than binormal oscillations. The additional forces of buoyancy and magnetic tension from the curvature of the loop increase and decrease the mode frequencies, respectively. The ratio of the frequencies of the first overtone to the fundamental mode is modified by the inclusion of buoyancy and curvature. We find that the normal polarization possesses a frequency ratio that exceeds the canonical value of 2, whereas the binormal polarization has a ratio less than 2.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.