Paper detail

Kinetics of the glass transition of fragile soft colloidal suspensions

Microscopic relaxation timescales are estimated from the autocorrelation functions obtained by dynamic light scattering experiments for Laponite suspensions with different concentrations ($C_{L}$), added salt concentrations ($C_{S}$) and temperatures ($T$). It has been shown in an earlier work [Soft Matter, 10, 3292-3300 (2014)] that the evolutions of relaxation timescales of colloidal glasses can be compared with molecular glass formers by mapping the waiting time ($t_{w}$) of the former with the inverse of thermodynamic temperature ($1/T$) of the latter. In this work, the fragility parameter $D$, which signifies the deviation from Arrhenius behavior, is obtained from fits to the time evolutions of the structural relaxation timescales. For the Laponite suspensions studied in this work, $D$ is seen to be independent of $C_{L}$ and $C_{S}$, but is weakly dependent on $T$. Interestingly, the behavior of $D$ corroborates the behavior of fragility in molecular glass formers with respect to equivalent variables. Furthermore, the stretching exponent $β$, which quantifies the width $w$ of the spectrum of structural relaxation timescales is seen to depend on $t_{w}$. A hypothetical Kauzmann time $t_{k}$, analogous to the Kauzmann temperature for molecular glasses, is defined as the timescale at which $w$ diverges. Corresponding to the Vogel temperature defined for molecular glasses, a hypothetical Vogel time $t^{\infty}_α$ is also defined as the time at which the structural relaxation time diverges. Interestingly, a correlation is observed between $t_{k}$ and $t^{\infty}_α$, which is remarkably similar to that known for fragile molecular glass formers. A coupling model that accounts for the $t_{w}$-dependence of the stretching exponent is used to analyse and explain the observed correlation between $t_{k}$ and $t^{\infty}_α$.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.