Paper detail

Kinetic Theory of the Presheath and the Bohm Criterion

A kinetic theory of the Bohm criterion is developed that is based on positive-exponent velocity moments of the plasma kinetic equation. This result is contrasted with the conventional kinetic Bohm criterion that is based on a v^{-1} moment of the Vlasov equation. The salient difference between the two results is that low velocity particles dominate in the conventional theory, but are essentially unimportant in the new theory. It is shown that the derivation of the conventional kinetic Bohm criterion is flawed. Low velocity particles can cause unphysical divergences in the conventional theory. These divergent contributions are avoided with this new approach. The two theories are compared using example distribution functions from previous presheath models. The importance of ion-ion and electron-electron collisions to determining the particle distribution functions throughout the presheath is also discussed. A kinetic equation that accounts for wave-particle scattering by convective instabilities is used to show that ion-acoustic instabilities in the presheath of low temperature plasmas (where T_e \gg T_i) can cause both ions and electrons to obtain Maxwellian distribution functions near the sheath.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.