Paper detail

Kinetic Theory of Collisionless Self-Gravitating Gases: Post-Newtonian Polytropes

In this paper we study the kinetic theory of many-particle astrophysical systems and we present a consistent version of the collisionless Boltzmann equation in the 1PN approximation. We argue that the equation presented by Rezania and Sobouti in A&A 354 1110 (2000) is not the correct expression to describe the evolution of a collisionless self-gravitating gas. One of the reasons that account for the previous statement is that the energy of a free-falling test particle, obeying the 1PN equations of motion for static gravitational fields, is not a static solution of the mentioned equation. The same statement holds for the angular momentum, in the case of spherical systems. We provide the necessary corrections and obtain an equation that is consistent with the corresponding equations of motion and the 1PN conserved quantities. We suggest some potential relevance for the study of high density astrophysical systems and as an application we construct the corrected version of the post-Newtonian polytropes.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.