Paper detail

Kinematics of the Compact Symmetric Object OQ 208 revisited

Aims. A long timeline kinematic study of the archetypal CSO OQ 208 sheds light on the physical properties of the most compact radio sources. Methods. Archival data from the VLBA at 15 GHz over a time span of 13.6 yr are used to investigate the kinematics of the radio source. The flux density monitoring data obtained at the Michigan 26-meter radio telescope are also used as supplementary information. Results. At 8.4 and 15 GHz, the two lobes are resolved into two sub-components, identified as hotspots. A knotty jet is linked with the NE hotspot and traces back toward the geometric center. The core is too weak to be detected. Significant flux density variation is found in the primary hotspots with the maximum level of 62% (NE1) and 19% (SW1). The peak in the flux density of NE1 leads that of SW1 by approximately 5.00 yr, suggesting that the northeast lobe is advancing and the southwest lobe is receding. This light travel difference indicates a radial distance difference between the two hotspots of 1.53 pc, which indicates an inclination angle of about 80.8 degree between the radio jet and the line of sight. The angular separation rate between NE1 and SW1 is 0.027 mas/yr (or 0.133 c). The inner jet knot moves at 0.047 mas/yr (or 0.230 c), about 3.5 times the hotspot advancing speed. Conclusions. The large viewing angle and the modest jet speed suggest a mildly relativistic jet. The jet axis is close to the plane of the sky. The separation rate and the distance between the two primary hotspots result in a kinematic age of 255$\pm$17 yr, confirming that OQ 208 is indeed a young radio source. In addition to the hotspot advancing motions, sideways motions provide evidence that the lobes are obstructed by the external interstellar medium.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access9 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.