Paper detail

Kinematics of the Central Stars Powering Bowshock Nebulae and the Large Multiplicity Fraction of Runaway OB Stars

OB stars powering stellar bowshock nebulae (SBNe) have been presumed to have large peculiar velocities. We measured peculiar velocities of SBN central stars to assess their kinematics relative to the general O star population using $Gaia$ EDR3 data for 267 SBN central stars and a sample of 455 Galactic O stars to derive projected velocities $v_{\rm 2D}$. For a subset of each sample we obtained new optical spectroscopy to measure radial velocities and identify multiple-star systems. We find a minimum multiplicity fraction of 36$\pm$6% among SBN central stars, consistent with $>$28% among runaway Galactic O stars. The large multiplicity fraction among runaways implicates very efficient dynamical ejection rather than binary-supernova origins. The median $v_{\rm 2D}$ of SBN central stars is $v_{\rm 2D}$=14.6 km s$^{-1}$, larger than the median $v_{\rm 2D}$=11.4 km s$^{-1}$ for non-bowshock O stars. Central stars of SBNe have a runaway ($v_{\rm 2D}$$>$25 km s$^{-1}$) fraction of 24$^{+9}_{-7}$%, consistent with the 22$^{+3}_{-3}$% for control-sample O stars. Most (76%) of SBNe central stars are not runaways. Our analysis of alignment ($Δ_{\rm PA}$) between the nebular morphological and $v_{\rm 2D}$ kinematic position angles reveals two populations: a highly aligned ($σ_{PA}$=25$^\circ$) population that includes stars with the largest $v_{\rm 2D}$ (31% of the sample) and a random (non-aligned) population (69% of the sample). SBNe that lie within or near HII regions comprise a larger fraction of this latter component than SBNe in isolated environments, implicating localized ISM flows as a factor shaping their orientations and morphologies. We outline a new conceptual approach to computing the Solar LSR motion, yielding [U$_\odot$, V$_\odot$, W$_\odot$]= [5.5, 7.5, 4.5] km s$^{-1}$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.