Paper detail

Kinematics of symmetric Galactic longitudes to probe the spiral arms of the Milky Way with Gaia

We model the effects of the spiral arms of the Milky Way on the disk stellar kinematics in the Gaia observable space. We also estimate the Gaia capabilities of detecting the predicted signatures. We use both controlled orbital integrations in analytic potentials and self-consistent simulations. We introduce a new strategy, which consists of comparing the stellar kinematics of symmetric Galactic longitudes (+l and -l), in particular the median transverse velocity (from parallaxes and proper motions). This approach does not require the assumption of an axisymmetric model. The typical differences between the transverse velocity in symmetric longitudes in the models are of ~2 km/s, but can be larger than 10 km/s for certain longitudes and distances. The kinematic differences for +l and -l show trends that depend on the properties of spiral arms. Thus, this method can be used to quantify the importance of the effects of spiral arms on the orbits of stars in the different disk regions, and to constrain the location of the arms, main resonances and, thus, pattern speed. Moreover, the method allows us to test the dynamical nature of the spiral structure (e.g. grand design versus transient multiple arms). We estimate the number of stars of each spectral type that Gaia will observe in representative Galactic longitudes, their errors in distance and transverse velocity, and the error in computing the median velocity as a function of distance. We will be able to measure the median transverse velocity with Gaia data, with precision smaller than ~1 km/s up to distances of ~4-6 kpc for certain giant stars, and up to ~2-4 kpc and better kinematic precision (<= 0.5 km\s) for certain sub-giants and dwarfs. These are enough to measure the typical signatures seen in the models. We also show that a similar strategy can be used with line-of-sight velocities from other upcoming spectroscopic surveys.(Abridged)

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.