Paper detail

Kinematics of OB Stars with Data from the LAMOST and Gaia Catalogues

We have analyzed the kinematics of OB stars from the list by Xiang et al. (2021) that contains $\sim$13 000 single OB stars. For these stars there are photometric distance estimates and proper motions from the Gaia catalogue and line-of-sight velocities from the LAMOST catalogue. Based on a sample of single OB stars and using the photometric distances and proper motions of stars from the Gaia EDR3 catalogue, we have found the group velocity components $(U_\odot,V_\odot,W_\odot)=(9.63,9.93,7.45)\pm(0.27,0.34,0.10)$ km s$^{-1}$, and the following parameters of the angular velocity of Galactic rotation: $Ω_0=29.20\pm0.18$ km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-1}$, $Ω^{'}_0=-4.150\pm0.046$ km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-2}$ and $Ω^{''}_0=0.795\pm0.018$ km s$^{-1}$ kpc$^{-3}$, where the error per unit weight $σ_0$ is 9.56 km s$^{-1}$ and $V_0=236.5\pm3.3$ km s$^{-1}$ (for the adopted $R_0=8.1\pm0.1$ kpc). Based on the same OB stars, we have found the residual velocity dispersions $(σ_1,σ_2,σ_3)=(15.13,9.69,7.98)\pm(0.07,0.05,0.04)$ km s$^{-1}$. We show that using the line-of-sight velocities increases significantly the space velocity dispersion and leads to a biased estimate of the velocity $U_\odot$. A comparison of the distances scales used has shown that the photometric distances from Xiang et al. (2021) should be lengthened approximately by 10%.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.