Paper detail

Kinematics and Dynamics of Multiphase Outflows in Simulations of the Star-Forming Galactic ISM

Galactic outflows produced by stellar feedback are known to be multiphase in nature. Both observations and simulations indicate that the material within several kpc of galactic disk mid-planes consists of warm clouds embedded within a hot wind. A theoretical understanding of the outflow phenomenon, including both winds and fountain flows, requires study of the interactions among thermal phases. We develop a method to quantify these interactions via measurements of mass, momentum, and energy flux exchanges using temporally and spatially averaged quantities and conservation laws. We apply this method to a star-forming ISM MHD simulation based on the TIGRESS framework, for Solar neighbourhood conditions. To evaluate the extent of interactions among the phases, we first examine the validity of the ``ballistic model,'' which predicts trajectories of the warm phase ($5050\,\rm{K}<T<2\times10^4\,\rm{K}$) treated as non-interacting clouds. This model is successful at intermediate vertical velocities ($ 50$ km s$^{-1}$ $\lesssim |v_z| \lesssim 100 $ km s$^{-1}$), but at higher velocities we observe an excess in simulated warm outflow compared to the ballistic model. This discrepancy cannot be fully accounted for by cooling of high-velocity intermediate-temperature ($2\times10^4\,\rm{K}<T<5\times10^5\,\rm{K}$) gas. By examining the fluxes of mass, momentum and energy, we conclude that warm phase gains mass via cooling of the intermediate phase, while momentum transfer occurs from the hot ($T>5\times10^5\,\rm{K}$) to the warm phase. The large energy flux from the hot outflow that is transferred to the warm and intermediate phases is quickly radiated away. A simple interaction model implies an effective warm cloud size in the fountain flow of a few 100~pc, showing that warm-hot flux exchange mainly involves a few large clouds rather than many small ones.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.