Paper detail

Kinematics and chemical properties of the Galactic stellar populations. The HARPS FGK dwarfs sample

(Abridged) We analyze chemical and kinematical properties of about 850 FGK solar neighborhood long-lived dwarfs observed with the HARPS high-resolution spectrograph. The stars in the sample have logg > 4 dex, 5000 < Teff < 6500 K, and -1.39 < [Fe/H] < 0.55 dex. We apply a purely chemical analysis approach based on the [alpha/Fe] vs. [Fe/H] plot to separate Galactic stellar populations into the thin disk, thick disk and high-alpha metal-rich (hamr). Our analysis shows a negative gradient of the rotational velocity of the thin disk stars with [Fe/H] (-17 km s^-1 dex^-1), and a steep positive gradient for both the thick disk and hamr stars with the same magnitude of about +42 km s^-1 dex^-1. For the thin disk stars we observed no correlation between orbital eccentricities and metallicity, but observed a steep negative gradient for the thick disk and hamr stars with practically the same magnitude (about -0.18 dex^-1). Our results suggest that radial migration played an important role in the formation and evolution of the thin disk. For the thick disk stars it is not possible to reach a firm conclusion about their origin. Based on the eccentricity distribution of the thick disk stars only their accretion origin can be ruled out, and the heating and migration scenario could explain the positive steep gradient of V_phi with [Fe/H]. Analyzing the hamr stellar population we found that they share properties of both the thin and thick disk population. A comparison of the properties of the hamr stars with that of the subsample of stars from the N-body/SPH simulation using radial migration suggest that they may have originated from the inner Galaxy. Further detailed investigations would help to clarify their exact nature and origin.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access10 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.