Paper detail

Kinematic studies of the IDV quasar 0917+624

For more than a decade from the late 1980s to the late 1990s, the intraday variable (IDV) quasar 0917+624 was known to be strongly variable with amplitude variations of 10-20% within 0.8 to 1.6 days. During that period it showed faster variability in the polarized flux and the polarization angle than in total intensity. However, since 2000 the IDV of this source has almost ceased, attaining a variability index of only less than a few percent. If interstellar scintillation was responsible for the IDV in the past, one possible explanation for the sudden change of the variability mode could be an intrinsic change in the morphology of the source, such as an increase in the size of the structural components that are responsible for the scintillation. New jet components appearing at the jet base could lead to a temporarily larger size of the scintillating component when compared to the scattering size of the interstellar medium, causing quenched scintillation. In order to test this scenario, VLBI observations of 0917+624 from 1999 to 2005 have been analysed. Here, we summarize first results and discuss them in the framework of the quenched scintillation model.

preprint2007arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.