Paper detail

Kinematic Evidence for Top Quark Pair Production in $W+$ Multijet Events in $p \bar p$ Collisions at $\sqrt{s}$~=~1.8 TeV

We present a study of $W+$multijet events that compares the kinematics of the observed events with expectations from direct QCD $W+$jet production and from production and decay of top quark pairs. The data were collected in the 1992-93 run with the Collider Detector at Fermilab from 19.3 pb$^{-1}$ of proton-anti proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=1.8$ TeV. From the $W+\geq 3$ jet events, a "signal sample" with an improved ratio of $t \bar{t}$ to QCD produced $W$ events is selected by requiring each jet to be emitted centrally in the event center of mass frame. This sample contains 14 events with unusually hard jet E$_T$ distributions not well described by expectations for jets from direct QCD $W$ production and other background processes. Using expected jet E$_T$ distributions, a relative likelihood is defined and used to determine if an event is more consistent with the decay of $t \bar{t}$ pairs, with M$_{top}$~=~ 170 GeV/c$^2$, than with direct QCD $W$ production, while only 1.7 such top--like events are expected in the absence of $t \bar{t}$. Good agreement in the jet spectra is obtained if jet production from $t \bar{t}$ pair decays is included. For those events kinematically more consistent with $t \bar{t}$ we find evidence for a $b$-quark content in their jets to the extent expected from top decay, and larger than expected for background processes. For events with four or more jets, the discrepancy with the predicted jet energy distributions from direct QCD $W$ production, and the associated excess of $b$-quark content is more pronounced.

preprint1994arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.