Paper detail

Kinematic and metallicity properties od the Aquarius dwarf galaxy from FORS2 MXU spectroscopy

Dwarf galaxies found in isolation in the Local Group (LG) are unlikely to have interacted with the large LG spirals, and therefore environmental effects should not be the main drivers of their evolution. We aim to provide insight into the internal mechanisms shaping LG dwarf galaxies by increasing our knowledge of the internal properties of isolated systems. We focus on the evolved stellar component of the Aquarius dwarf, whose kinematic and metallicity properties have only recently started to be explored. We have obtained spectroscopic data in the the near-infrared CaII triplet lines region with FORS2 at the Very Large Telescope for 53 red giant branch (RGB) stars, to derive line-of-sight velocities and [Fe/H] of the individual RGB stars. We have derived a systemic velocity of $-142.2^{+1.8}_{-1.8}$ km s$^{-1}$, in agreement with previous measurements from both the HI gas and stars. The internal kinematics of Aquarius appears to be best modelled by a combination of random motions (l.o.s. velocity dispersion of $10.3^{+1.6}_{-1.3}$ km s$^{-1}$) and linear rotation (with a gradient $-5.0^{+1.6}_{-1.9}$ km s$^{-1}$ arcmin$^{-1}$) along a P.A.=$139_{-27}^{+17}$ deg, consistent with the optical projected major axis. This rotation signal is significantly misaligned or even counter-rotating to that derived from the HI gas. We also find the tentative presence of a mild negative metallicity gradient and indications that the metal-rich stars have a colder velocity dispersion than the metal-poor ones. This work represents a significant improvement with respect to previous measurements of the RGB stars of Aquarius, as it doubles the number of member stars studied in the literature. We speculate that the misaligned rotation between the HI gas and evolved stellar component might have been the result of recent accretion of HI gas or re-accretion after gas-loss due to internal stellar feedback.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access13 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.