Paper detail

Kinematic analysis of EAGLE simulations: Evolution of $λ_{Re}$ and its connection with mergers and gas accretion

We have developed a new tool to analyse galaxies in the EAGLE simulations as close as possible to observations.We investigated the evolution of their kinematic properties by means of the angular momentum proxy parameter,$ λ_{Re} $for galaxies with $M_{*} \ge 5 \times 10^{9} M_{\odot}$ in the RefL0100N1504 simulation up to redshift two (z = 2). Galaxies in the simulation show a wide variety of kinematic features, similiar to those found in integral-field spectroscopic studies. At z=0 the distribution of galaxies in the $λ_{Re}-ε$ plane is also in good agreement with results from observations. Scaling relations at z = 0 indicate that there is critical mass, $M_{crit} = 10^{10.3} M_{\odot}$, that divides two different regimes when we include the $λ_{Re}$ parameter. The simulation shows that the distribution of galaxies in the $λ_{Re}-ε$ plane evolves with time until z = 2 when galaxies are equally distributed both in $λ_{Re}$ and $ε$. We studied the evolution of $λ_{Re}$ with time and found that there is no connection between the angular momentum at z = 2 and z = 0. All systems reach their maximum $λ_{Re}$ at z = 1 and then steadily lose angular momentum regardless of their merger history, except for the high star-forming systems that sustain that maximum value over time. The evolution of the Re in galaxies that have not experienced any merger in the last 10 Gyr can be explained by their level of gas accretion.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.