Paper detail

Kilonova Emission From Black Hole-Neutron Star Mergers. I. Viewing-Angle-Dependent Lightcurves

In this paper, we present a numerical method to study the predicted lightcurves as a function of viewing angle. We extrapolate the fitting formulae for the mass and velocity of tidal dynamical ejecta across a wide range of mass ratio validated with 66 simulations and use them in the calculations of the kilonova lightcurves. The calculated peak luminosity of a BH-NS merger kilonova is typically about a few times $10^{41}\ {\rm erg\ s^{-1}}$, which is always $\lesssim4.5\times10^{41}\ {\rm erg\ s^{-1}}$. This corresponds to the AB absolute magnitudes fainter than $\sim -15\ {\rm mag}$ in optical and $\sim -16\ {\rm mag}$ in infrared. Since the projected photosphere area of the dynamical ejecta is much larger than that of the disk wind outflows, the dynamical ejecta usually contribute to the majority of the kilonova emission from BH-NS mergers. The fitted blackbody temperature and the shape of the observed multi-band lightcurves are insensitive to the line of sight. The peak time of the observed multi-band lightcurves, affected by the light propagation effect, is related to the relative motion direction between the dynamical ejecta and the observer. The observed luminosity varies with the projected photosphere area determined by the viewing angles. However, the predicted peak luminosity only varies by a factor of $\sim (2 - 3)$ (or by $\sim1\ {\rm mag}$) for different viewing angles. When the short-duration gamma-ray burst afterglow is taken into account, for an on-axis geometry, the kilonova emission is usually outshone by the afterglow emission and can be only observed in the redder bands, especially in the $K$-band at late times. Compared with GW170817/AT2017gfo, the BH-NS merger kilonovae are optically dim but possibly infrared bright. At the same epoch after the merger, the blackbody fitting temperature of the BH-NS merger kilonovae is lower than that of GW170817/AT2017gfo.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.