Paper detail

Kilohertz Gravitational Waves from Binary Neutron Star Mergers: Inference of Postmerger Signals with the Einstein Telescope

Next-generation detectors are expected to be sensitive to postmerger signals from binary neutron star coalescences and thus to directly probe the remnant dynamics. We investigate the scientific potential of postmerger detections with the Einstein Telescope using full Bayesian analyses with the state-of-the-art waveform model ${\tt NRPMw}$. We find that: (i) Postmerger signals with signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) ${\sim}7$ can be confidently detected with a Bayes' factor of $\log{\cal B}\simeq 5$ ($\rm e$-folded) and the posterior distributions report informative measurements already at SNR ${\sim}6$ for some noise realizations. (ii) The postmerger peak frequency $f_2$ can be confidently identified at SNR $7$ with errors of $O(1~{\rm kHz})$, that decrease below $O(100~{\rm Hz})$ for SNR 10. (iii) The remnant's time of collapse to black hole can be constrained to $O(20~{\rm ms})$ at SNR 10. However, the inference can be biased by noise fluctuationsif the latter exceed the signal's amplitude before collapse. (iv) Violations of the EOS-insentive relations for $f_2$ can be detected at SNR $\gtrsim 8$ if the frequency shifts are $\gtrsim 500~{\rm Hz}$; they can be smoking guns for EOS softening effects at extreme densities. However, the $f_2$ measurement can be significantly biased by subdominant frequency components for short-lived remnants. In these cases, an EOS softening might be better inferred from the remnant's earlier collapse.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.