Paper detail

Keystroke Dynamics as Part of Lifelogging

In this paper we present the case for including keystroke dynamics in lifelogging. We describe how we have used a simple keystroke logging application called Loggerman, to create a dataset of longitudinal keystroke timing data spanning a period of more than 6 months for 4 participants. We perform a detailed analysis of this data by examining the timing information associated with bigrams or pairs of adjacently-typed alphabetic characters. We show how there is very little day-on-day variation of the keystroke timing among the top-200 bigrams for some participants and for others there is a lot and this correlates with the amount of typing each would do on a daily basis. We explore how daily variations could correlate with sleep score from the previous night but find no significant relation-ship between the two. Finally we describe the public release of this data as well including as a series of pointers for future work including correlating keystroke dynamics with mood and fatigue during the day.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.