Paper detail

keV Photon Emission from Light Nonthermal Dark Matter

We propose a possible explanation for the recent claim of an excess at 3.5 keV in the X-ray spectrum within a minimal extension of the standard model that explains dark matter and baryon abundance of the universe. The dark matter mass in this model is ${\cal O}({\rm GeV})$ and its relic density has a non-thermal origin. The model includes two colored scalars of ${\cal O}({\rm TeV})$ mass ($X_{1,2}$), and two singlet fermions that are almost degenerate in mass with the proton ($N_{1,2}$). The heavier fermion $N_2$ undergoes radiative decay to the lighter one $N_1$ that is absolutely stable. Radiative decay with a life time $\sim 10^{23}$ seconds can account for the claimed 3.5 keV line, which requires couplings $\sim 10^{-3}-10^{-1}$ between $X_{1,2}, ~ N_{1,2}$ and the up-type quarks. The model also gives rise to potentially detectable monojet, dijet, and monotop signals at the LHC.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.