Paper detail

Kernel optimization for Low-Rank Multi-Fidelity Algorithms

One of the major challenges for low-rank multi-fidelity (MF) approaches is the assumption that low-fidelity (LF) and high-fidelity (HF) models admit "similar" low-rank kernel representations. Low-rank MF methods have traditionally attempted to exploit low-rank representations of linear kernels, which are kernel functions of the form $K(u,v) = v^T u$ for vectors $u$ and $v$. However, such linear kernels may not be able to capture low-rank behavior, and they may admit LF and HF kernels that are not similar. Such a situation renders a naive approach to low-rank MF procedures ineffective. In this paper, we propose a novel approach for the selection of a near-optimal kernel function for use in low-rank MF methods. The proposed framework is a two-step strategy wherein: (1) hyperparameters of a library of kernel functions are optimized, and (2) a particular combination of the optimized kernels is selected, through either a convex mixture (Additive Kernels) or through a data-driven optimization (Adaptive Kernels). The two resulting methods for this generalized framework both utilize only the available inexpensive low-fidelity data and thus no evaluation of high-fidelity simulation model is needed until a kernel is chosen. These proposed approaches are tested on five non-trivial problems including multi-fidelity surrogate modeling for one- and two-species molecular systems, gravitational many-body problem, associating polymer networks, plasmonic nano-particle arrays, and an incompressible flow in channels with stenosis. The results for these numerical experiments demonstrate the numerical stability efficiency of both proposed kernel function selection procedures, as well as high accuracy of their resultant predictive models for estimation of quantities of interest. Comparisons against standard linear kernel procedures also demonstrate increased accuracy of the optimized kernel approaches.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.