Paper detail

Kepler exoplanets: a new method of population analysis

This paper introduces a new method of inferring the intrinsic exoplanet population from Kepler data, based on the assumption that the frequency of exoplanets can be represented by a smooth function of planet radius and period. The method is applied to the two most recent data releases from the Kepler project, q1-16 and q1-17, over the range of periods 0.5 to 512 days, and radii 0.5 to 16 Earth radii. Both of these releases have known biases, with the first believed to contain excess false positives, and the second excess false negatives, so any analysis of them should be viewed with caution. We apply the new method of population estimation to these releases, treating them like practice data sets. With this method, we tentatively find that the average number of planets per star would be about $5.7\pm0.8$ for F stars, $5.0\pm0.2$ for G stars, $4.0\pm0.3$ for K stars, and $6.5\pm1.7$ for M stars, indicating a decreasing trend with FGK spectral type, but an upward jump for M stars. A second conclusion is that the number of planets per G star, per natural log unit of period (days) and radii (Earths) at the period and radius of the Earth around the Sun, is about $Γ_\oplus(G) = 1.1\pm 0.1$. A related parameter, $η_{\oplus}$, which in addition depends on the range of period and radius considered, is found to be $η_{\oplus}(G) \simeq 1.0 \pm 0.1 $. More definitive conclusions, and validation of these preliminary values, await the final release of Kepler's transiting exoplanet list.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.