Paper detail

Kelvin-Helmholtz instability on coronal mass ejecta in the lower corona

We model an imaged Kelvin-Helmholtz (KH) instability on a coronal mass ejecta (CME) in the lower corona by investigating conditions under which kink ($m = 1$) and $m = -3$ magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) modes in an uniformly twisted flux tube moving along its axis become unstable. We employ the dispersion relations of MHD modes derived from the linearised magnetohydrodynamic equations. We assume real wave numbers and complex angular wave frequencies, namely complex wave phase velocities. The dispersion relations are solved numerically at fixed input parameters (taken from observational data) and various mass flow velocities. It is shown that the stability of the modes depends upon four parameters, the density contrast between the flux tube and its environment, the ratio of the background magnetic fields in the two media, the twist of the magnetic field lines inside the tube, and the value of the Alfvén Mach number (the ratio of the tube velocity to Alfvén speed inside the flux tube). For a twisted magnetic flux tube at a density contrast of $0.88$, background magnetic field ratio of $1.58$, and a normalised magnetic field twist of $0.2$, the critical speed for the kink ($m = -3$) mode (where $m$ is the azimuthal mode number) is $678$ km\,s$^{-1}$ just as it is observed. The growth rate for this harmonic at KH wavelength of $18.5$ Mm and ejecta width of $4.1$ Mm is equal to $0.037$ s$^{-1}$, in agreement with observations. KH instability of the $m = -3$ mode may also explain why the KH vortices are seen only at the one side of arising CME. The good agreement between observational and computational data shows that the imaged KH instability on CME can be explained in terms of emerging KH instability of the $m = -3$ MHD mode in twisted magnetic flux tube moving along its axis.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.