Paper detail

Kelvin--Helmholtz instability in an active region jet observed with Hinode

Over past ten years a variety of jet-like phenomena were detected in the solar atmosphere, including plasma ejections over a range of coronal temperatures being observed as extreme ultraviolet (EUV) and X-ray jets. We study the possibility for the development of Kelvin--Helmholtz (KH) instability of transverse magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) waves traveling along an EUV jet situated on the west side of NOAA AR 10938 and observed by three instruments on board Hinode on 2007 January 15/16 (Chifor et al., Astron. Astrophys.481, L57 (2008)). The jet was observed around LogT_e = 6.2 with up-flow velocities exceeded 150 km/s. Using Fe XII lambda186 and lambda195 line ratios, the measured densities were found to be above LogN_e = 11. We have modeled that EUV jet as a vertically moving magnetic flux tube (untwisted and weakly twisted) and have studied the propagation characteristics of the kink (m = 1) mode and the higher m modes with azimuthal mode numbers m = 2, 3, 4. It turns out that all these MHD waves can become unstable at flow velocities in the range of 112--114.8 km/s. The lowest critical jet velocity of 112 km/s is obtained when modeling the jet as compressible plasma contained in an untwisted magnetic flux tube. We have compared two analytically found criteria for predicting the threshold Alfven Mach number for the onset of KH instability and have concluded that one of them yields reliable values for the critical Alfven Mach number. Our study of the nature of stable and unstable MHD modes propagating on the jet shows that in a stable regime all the modes are pure surface waves, while the unstable kink (m = 1) mode in untwisted compressible plasma flux tube becomes a leaky wave. In the limit of incompressible media (for the jet and its environment) all unstable modes are non-leaky surface waves.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.