Paper detail

Kelvin-Helmholtz Instabilities in Multi-Sized Dust Layers

We examine the effect of the dust size distribution on Kelvin-Helmholtz instabilities in the protoplanetary disk with dust sedimentation. With newly taking into account the dust size distribution, the growth rate of the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability is calculated using the linear stability analysis with the dust density distribution consistent with sedimentation. Dust abundance required for gravitational instabilities before the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability is derived from the linear stability analysis, and it is found that the required dust abundance significantly coincides with that estimated from the Richardson number. It is also found that when the dust size distribution is taken into account, the critical Richardson number for the onset of the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability tends to increase with dust abundance. This result is different from that in the case without the dust size distribution.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.