KASHz: No evidence for ionised outflows instantaneously suppressing star formation in moderate luminosity AGN at zz∼\sim1.41.4-2.62.6

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Abstract

As part of our KMOS AGN Survey at High-redshift (KASHz), we present spatially-resolved VLT/KMOS and VLT/SINFONI spectroscopic data and ALMA 870μμm continuum imaging of eight zz=1.4--2.6 moderate AGN (L2−10kevL_{\rm 2-10 \rm kev} = 1042−104510^{42} - 10^{45} ergs s−1^{-1}). We map [OIII], Hαα and rest-frame FIR emission to search for any spatial anti-correlation between ionised outflows (traced by the [OIII] line) and star formation (SF; traced by Hαα and FIR), that has previously been claimed for some high-z AGN and used as evidence for negative and/or positive AGN feedback. Firstly, we conclude that Hαα is unreliable to map SF inside our AGN host galaxies based on: (i) SF rates inferred from attenuation-corrected Hαα can lie below those inferred from FIR; (ii) the FIR continuum is more compact than the Hαα emission by a factor of ∼2\sim 2 on average; (iii) in half of our sample, we observe significant spatial offsets between the FIR and Hαα emission, with an average offset of 1.4±0.61.4\pm0.6 kpc. Secondly, for the five targets with outflows we find no evidence for a spatial anti-correlation between outflows and SF using either Hαα or FIR as a tracer. This holds for our re-analysis of a famous zz=1.6 X-ray AGN (`XID 2028') where positive and negative feedback has been previously claimed. Based on our results, any impact on SF by ionised outflows must be subtle, either occurring on scales below our resolution, or on long timescales.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.