Paper detail

Karman constant and accurate mean flow prediction in a turbulent pipe

The Karman constant κ- widely used in atmospheric science and engineering turbulence modelling, and proposed by Prandtl in 1925 and von Karman in 1930 to describe the mean velocity of a turbulent wall-bounded flow - leads to a logarithmic profile in an overlap region near the wall. For over eighty years, its value was believed to be ~0.41. But more recently, many argue that it is not a constant, because of measured variations in different flows and at different Reynolds numbers (Re). Here, a multi-layer analytic theory is shown to lead to a re-interpretation of κas a global constant for both the overlap region and outer flow, and to yield a new method for its measurement. The newly determined value is 0.45 for both channel and pipe. It is shown that this new κ, together with other wall constants, yields a 99% accuracy in the prediction of mean velocity data at all points in high Re (up to 40 million) pipe flow. The theory also describes finite Re effect, and discovers a transition at the friction Re (i.e. Re_τ)=5000. An accurate model for the prediction of turbulent transport in canonical pipe and channel flows is achieved here, and we propose the model to be valid for a wide class of turbulent flows.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.