Paper detail

$K^+\to π^+ν\barν$: a rising star on the stage of flavour physics

Motivated by the new experimental information reported by the BNL--E787 Collaboration, we analyse the present impact and the future prospects opened by the measurement of $\br(K^+\toπ^+ν\barν)$. Although still affected by a large error, the BNL--E787 result favours values of $\br(K^+\to π^+ν\barν)$ substantially larger than what expected within the Standard Model. As a result, this data already provide non-trivial constraints on the unitarity triangle, when interpreted within the Standard Model framework. We stress the importance of the clean relation between $\br(K^+\to π^+ν\barν)$, $\sin2β$ and $ΔM_{B_d}/ΔM_{B_s}$ that in the next few years could provide one of the deepest probes of the Standard Model in the sector of quark-flavour dynamics. A speculative discussion about possible non-standard interpretations of a large $\br(K^+\to π^+ν\barν)$ is also presented. Two main scenarios naturally emerge: those with direct new-physics contributions to the $s \to d ν\barν$ amplitude and those with direct new-physics effects only in $B_d$--$\bar B_d$ mixing. Realistic models originating these two scenarios and possible future strategies to clearly identify them are briefly discussed.

preprint2002arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.