Paper detail

K-shell Emission of Neutral Iron Line from Sgr B2 Excited by Subrelativistic Protons

We investigated the emission of K$α$ iron line from the massive molecular clouds in the Galactic center (GC). We assume that at present the total flux of this emission consists of time variable component generated by primary X-ray photons ejected by Sagittarius A$^\ast$ (Sgr A$^\ast$) in the past and a relatively weak quasi-stationary component excited by impact of protons which were generated by star accretion onto the central black hole. The level of background emission was estimated from a rise of the 6.4 keV line intensity in the direction of several molecular clouds, that we interpreted as a stage when the X-ray front ejected by Sgr A$^\ast$ entered into these clouds. The 6.4 keV emission before this intensity jump we interpreted as emission generated by subrelativistic cosmic rays there. The cross-section of K$α$ vacancies produced by protons differs from that of electrons or X-rays. Therefore, we expect that this processes can be distinguished from the analysis of the equivalent width of the iron line and time variations of the width can be predicted. The line intensity from the clouds depends on their distance from Sgr A$^\ast$ and the coefficient of spacial diffusion near the Galactic center. We expect that in a few years the line intensity for the cloud G\,0.11$-$0.11 which is relatively close to Sgr A$^\ast$ will decreases to the level $\lesssim$ 10% from its present value. For the cloud Sagittarius B2 (Sgr B2) the situation is more intricate. If the diffusion coefficient $D\gtrsim 10^{27}$ cm$^2$ s$^{-1}$ then the expected stationary flux should be about 10% of its level in 2000. In the opposite case the line intensity from Sgr B2 should drop down to zero because the protons do not reach the cloud.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.