Paper detail

K I 7699 Å and related shell lines during the recent eclipse of $ε$ Aurigae

We report high-resolution (R = 30\ 000, 45\ 000 and 75\ 000) echelle and medium-resolution (R = 22\ 000 and 10\ 000) spectroscopic observations of the long-period, eclipsing binary $ε$ Aurigae during the 2009 - 2011 eclipse. Low-excitation shell lines, viz, the K {\sevensize \rm I} line at 7699 Å (with 346 data points), Cr {\sevensize \rm I} lines at 5345.807 Å and 5348.326 Å and Fe {\sevensize \rm I} line at 5110.435 Å which originated from the disk shaped secondary, H$α$ and the shell components of the Na D$_{1}$ and D$_{2}$ lines show significant variation in their shapes and radial velocities during the eclipse. The equivalent width curve shown by the K {\sevensize \rm I} line around the ingress and egress phases indicates that the gas density in the trailing edge is about a factor of two higher than the density in the leading edge. Using a geometrical model, in which a homogeneous, cylindrical Keplarian disk eclipses the F0Ia primary star and the shell absorption lines originate from the gaseous atmosphere around an opaque disk, we fit the equivalent width and the radial velocity curves of the K {\sevensize \rm I} line covering the full eclipse. A reasonably good fit can be achieved by a low-mass binary model where the mass of the central star of the disk is 5.4 M$_{\odot}$ and the mass of the primary is 2.5 M$_{\odot}$ and a disk size of 8.9 AU. The low-mass of the primary, with enhanced $s$-process elements found by Sadakane et al. (2010), supports that it is a post-AGB F supergiant. For the high-mass binary model, the modelled radial velocity curve deviates significantly from the observations.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.