Paper detail

K-equivalence in Birational Geometry

We give a survey of the background and recent development on the $K$-equivalence relation among birational manifolds. After a brief historical sketch of birational geometry, we define the $K$-partial ordering and $K$-equivalence in a birational class and discuss geometric situations that lead to these notions. One application to the filling-in problem for threefolds is given. We discuss the motivic aspect of $K$-equivalence relation. We believe that $K$-equivalent manifolds have the same Chow motive though we are unable to prove it at this moment. Instead we discuss various approaches toward the corresponding statements in different cohomological realizations. We also formulate the {\it Main Conjectures} and prove a weak version of it. Namely, up to complex cobordism, $K$-equivalence can be decomposed into composite of classical flops. Finally we review some other current researches that are related to the study of $K$-equivalence relation.

preprint2002arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.