Paper detail

$K_{2,3}$-induced minor-free graphs admit quasi-isometry with additive distortion to graphs of tree-width at most two

A graph $H$ is an \emph{induced minor} of a graph $G$ if $H$ can be obtained from $G$ by a sequence of edge contractions and vertex deletions. Otherwise, $G$ is \emph{$H$-induced minor-free}. In this paper, we provide a different proof of the fact that $K_{2,3}$-induced minor-free graphs admit a quasi-isometry with additive distortion to graphs with tree-width at most two. Our proof yields a $O(nm)$-time algorithm which takes as input a $K_{2,3}$-induced minor-free graph with $n$ vertices and $m$ edges, and outputs a tree-width two graph $H$ with the desired additive distortion. For \emph{universally signable} graphs, a subclass of $K_{2,3}$-induced minor-free graphs, the time complexity of our algorithm is linear. As a consequence, we obtain a truly sub-quadratic time additive constant factor approximation algorithm to compute the \emph{diameter} of a universally signable graph. In contrast, assuming the \emph{Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis} (\textsc{SETH}), the diameter of split graphs (a very restricted class of universally signable graphs), cannot be computed in truly sub-quadratic time [Borassi et al. (ENTCS, 2016)].

preprint2026arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.