Paper detail

Jumping the Gap: The Formation Conditions and Mass Function of Pebble-Pile Planetesimals

In a turbulent proto-planetary disk, dust grains undergo large density fluctuations and under the right circumstances, these grain overdensities can overcome shear, turbulent, and gas pressure support to collapse under self-gravity (forming a "pebble pile" planetesimal). Using a simple analytic model for the fluctuations predicted in simulations, we estimate the rate-of-formation and mass function of self-gravitating, rapidly-collapsing planetesimal-mass bodies formed by this mechanism. The statistics of this process depend sensitively on the size/stopping time of the grains, disk surface density, and turbulent Mach numbers. However, when it occurs, we predict that the resulting planetesimal mass function is broad and quasi-universal, with a slope dN/dM~1/M^(1-2), spanning a size/mass range ~10-1e4 km (~1e-9-5.0 M_Earth). Collapse to planetesimal through super-Earth masses is possible. The key condition is that grain density fluctuations reach large amplitudes on large scales, where gravitational instability proceeds most easily (collapse of small grains is strongly suppressed by turbulent vorticity). We show this leads to a new criterion for 'pebble-pile' formation in terms of the dimensionless particle stopping time (tau_stop > f(Q,Z,alpha)). In a MMSN, this requires grains larger than a=(50,1,0.1)cm at r=(1,30,100)au. At small radii, it would depend on the existence of large boulders. However, because density fluctuations depend super-exponentially on tau_stop (inversely proportional to disk surface density), lower-density disks are more unstable. In fact, we predict that cm-sized grains at ~1au will form pebble piles in a disk with ~10% the MMSN density, so planet formation at ~au may generically occur late, as disks are evaporating. We also predict that conditions become progressively more favorable for pebble-pile formation around lower-mass, cooler stars.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.