Paper detail

Jordan-Chevalley decomposition in finite dimesional Lie algebras

Let $\g$ be a finite dimensional Lie algebra over a field $k$ of characteristic zero. An element $x$ of $\g$ is said to have an \emph{abstract Jordan-Chevalley decomposition} if there exist unique $s,n\in\g$ such that $x=s+n$, $[s,n]=0$ and given any finite dimensional representation $π:\g\to\gl(V)$ the Jordan-Chevalley decomposition of $π(x)$ in $\gl(V)$ is $π(x)=π(s)+π(n)$. In this paper we prove that $x\in\g$ has an abstract Jordan-Chevalley decomposition if and only if $x\in [\g,\g]$, in which case its semisimple and nilpotent parts are also in $[\g,\g]$ and are explicitly determined. We derive two immediate consequences: (1) every element of $\g$ has an abstract Jordan-Chevalley decomposition if and only if $\g$ is perfect; (2) if $\g$ is a Lie subalgebra of $\gl(n,k)$ then $[\g,\g]$ contains the semisimple and nilpotent parts of all its elements. The last result was first proved by Bourbaki using different methods. Our proof only uses elementary linear algebra and basic results on the representation theory of Lie algebras, such as the Invariance Lemma and Lie's Theorem, in addition to the fundamental theorems of Ado and Levi.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.