Paper detail

Jointly Broadcasting Data and Power with Quality of Service Guarantees

In this work, we consider a scenario wherein an energy harvesting wireless radio equipment sends information to multiple receivers alongside powering them. In addition to harvesting the incoming radio frequency (RF) energy, the receivers also harvest energy from {its environment (e.g., solar energy)}. This communication framework is captured by a fading Gaussian Broadcast Channel (GBC) with energy harvesting transmitter and receivers. In order to ensure {some quality of service (QoS)} in data reception among the receivers, we impose a \textit{minimum-rate} requirement on data transmission. For the setting in place, we characterize the fundamental limits in jointly transmitting information and power subject to a QoS guarantee, for three cardinal receiver structures namely, \textit{ideal}, \textit{time-switching} and \textit{power-splitting}. We show that a time-switching receiver can {switch} between {information reception mode} and {energy harvesting mode}, \textit{without} the transmitter's knowledge of the same and \textit{without} any extra \textit{rate loss}. We also prove that, for the same amount of power transferred, on average, a power-splitting receiver supports higher data rates compared to a time-switching receiver.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.