Paper detail

Joint Optimization of Preamble Selection and Access Barring for Random Access in MTC with General Device Activities

Most existing random access schemes for machine-type communications (MTC) simply adopt a uniform preamble selection distribution, irrespective of the underlying device activity distributions. Hence, they may yield unsatisfactory access efficiency. In this paper, we model device activities for MTC as multiple Bernoulli random variables following an arbitrary multivariate Bernoulli distribution which can reflect both dependent and independent device activities. Then, we optimize preamble selection and access barring for random access in MTC according to the underlying joint device activity distribution. Specifically, we investigate three cases of the joint device activity distribution, i.e., the cases of perfect, imperfect, and unknown joint device activity distributions, and formulate the average, worst-case average, and sample average throughput maximization problems, respectively. The problems in the three cases are challenging nonconvex problems. In the case of perfect joint device activity distribution, we develop an iterative algorithm and a low-complexity iterative algorithm to obtain stationary points of the original problem and an approximate problem, respectively. In the case of imperfect joint device activity distribution, we develop an iterative algorithm and a low-complexity iterative algorithm to obtain a Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) point of an equivalent problem and a stationary point of an approximate problem, respectively. Finally, in the case of unknown joint device activity distribution, we develop an iterative algorithm to obtain a stationary point. The proposed solutions are widely applicable and outperform existing solutions for dependent and independent device activities.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.