Paper detail

Joint Detection and Super-Resolution Estimation of Multipath Signal Parameters Using Incremental Automatic Relevance Determination

The presented work investigates a sparse Bayesian incremental automatic relevance determination (IARD) algorithm in the context of multipath parameter estimation in a super-resolution regime. The corresponding estimation problem is highly nonlinear and, in general, requires an estimation of the number of multipath components. In the IARD approach individual multipath components are processed sequentially, which permits a tractable convergence analysis of the corresponding inference expressions. This leads to a simple condition, termed here a pruning condition, that determines if a multipath component is "sparsified" or retained in the model, thus permitting a fast and adaptive realization of the estimation algorithm. Yet previous experiments demonstrated that IARD fails to select the correct number of components when the parameters entering nonlinearly the multipath model are also estimated. To understand this effect, an analysis of the statistical structure of the pruning condition is proposed. It is shown that the corresponding test statistic in the pruning condition follows an extreme value distribution. As a result, the standard IARD algorithm implements a statistical test with a very high probability of false alarm. This leads to insertion of estimation artifacts and underestimation of signal sparsity. Moreover, the probability of false alarm worsens as the number of measured signal samples grows. Based on the developed statistical interpretation of the IARD, an optimal adjustment of the pruning condition is proposed. This permits a reliable and efficient removal of estimation artifacts and joint estimation of signal parameters, as well as optimal model order selection within a sparse Bayesian learning framework.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.