Paper detail

Joint CNN and Transformer Network via weakly supervised Learning for efficient crowd counting

Currently, for crowd counting, the fully supervised methods via density map estimation are the mainstream research directions. However, such methods need location-level annotation of persons in an image, which is time-consuming and laborious. Therefore, the weakly supervised method just relying upon the count-level annotation is urgently needed. Since CNN is not suitable for modeling the global context and the interactions between image patches, crowd counting with weakly supervised learning via CNN generally can not show good performance. The weakly supervised model via Transformer was sequentially proposed to model the global context and learn contrast features. However, the transformer directly partitions the crowd images into a series of tokens, which may not be a good choice due to each pedestrian being an independent individual, and the parameter number of the network is very large. Hence, we propose a Joint CNN and Transformer Network (JCTNet) via weakly supervised learning for crowd counting in this paper. JCTNet consists of three parts: CNN feature extraction module (CFM), Transformer feature extraction module (TFM), and counting regression module (CRM). In particular, the CFM extracts crowd semantic information features, then sends their patch partitions to TRM for modeling global context, and CRM is used to predict the number of people. Extensive experiments and visualizations demonstrate that JCTNet can effectively focus on the crowd regions and obtain superior weakly supervised counting performance on five mainstream datasets. The number of parameters of the model can be reduced by about 67%~73% compared with the pure Transformer works. We also tried to explain the phenomenon that a model constrained only by count-level annotations can still focus on the crowd regions. We believe our work can promote further research in this field.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.