Paper detail

Joining Transition Systems of Records: Some Congruency and Language-Theoretic Results

Büchi automaton of records (BAR) has been proposed as a basic operational semantics for Reo coordination language. It is an extension of Büchi automaton by using a set of records as its alphabet or transition labels. Records are used to express the synchrony between the externally visible actions of coordinated components modeled by BARs. The main composition operator on the set of BARs is called as join which is the semantics of its counterpart in Reo. In this paper, we define the notion of labeled transition systems of records as a generalization of the notion of BAR, abstracting away from acceptance or rejection of strings. Then, we consider four equivalence relations (semantics) over the set of labeled transition systems of records and investigate their congruency with respect to the join composition operator. In fact, we prove that the finite-traces-based, infinite-traces-based, and nondeterministic finite automata (NFA)-based equivalence relations all are congruence relations over the set of all labeled transition systems of records with respect to the join operation. However, the equivalence relation using Büchi acceptance condition is not so. In addition, using these results, we introduce the language-theoretic definitions of the join operation considering both finite and infinite strings notions. Also, we show that there is no language-based and structure-independent definition of the join operation on Büchi automata of records.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.