Paper detail

Join-the-Shortest Queue Diffusion Limit in Halfin-Whitt Regime: Sensitivity on the Heavy-traffic Parameter

Consider a system of $N$ parallel single-server queues with unit-exponential service time distribution and a single dispatcher where tasks arrive as a Poisson process of rate $λ(N)$. When a task arrives, the dispatcher assigns it to one of the servers according to the Join-the-Shortest Queue (JSQ) policy. Eschenfeldt and Gamarnik (Math. Oper. Res., 43(3):867-886, 2018) identified a novel limiting diffusion process that arises as the weak-limit of the appropriately scaled occupancy measure of the system under the JSQ policy in the Halfin-Whitt regime, where $(N - λ(N)) / \sqrt{N} \to β> 0$ as $N \to \infty$. The analysis of this diffusion goes beyond the state of the art techniques, and even proving its ergodicity is non-trivial, and was left as an open question. Recently, exploiting a generator expansion framework via the Stein's method, Braverman (arXiv:1801.05121, 2018) established its exponential ergodicity, and adapting a regenerative approach, Banerjee and Mukherjee (Ann. Appl. Probab., 29(2):1262-1309, 2018) analyzed the tail properties of the stationary distribution and path fluctuations of the diffusion. However, the analysis of the bulk behavior of the stationary distribution, viz., the moments, remained intractable until this work. In this paper, we perform a thorough analysis of the bulk behavior of the stationary distribution of the diffusion process, and discover that it exhibits different qualitative behavior, depending on the value of the heavy-traffic parameter $β$. Moreover, we obtain precise asymptotic laws of the centered and scaled steady state distribution, as $β$ tends to 0 and $\infty$. Of particular interest, we also establish a certain intermittency phenomena in the $β\to \infty$ regime and a surprising distributional convergence result in the $β\to 0$ regime.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.