Paper detail

Jets from main sequence and white dwarf companions during common envelope evolution

It has long been speculated that jet feedback from accretion onto the companion during a common envelope (CE) event could affect the orbital evolution and envelope unbinding process, but this conjecture has heretofore remained largely untested. We present global 3D hydrodynamical simulations of CE evolution (CEE) that include a jet subgrid model and compare them with an otherwise identical model without a jet. Our binary consists of a $2M_\odot$ red giant branch primary and a $1M_\odot$ or $0.5M_\odot$ main sequence or white dwarf secondary companion modeled as a point particle. We run the simulations for 10 orbits (40 days). Our jet model adds mass at a constant rate $\dot{M}_\mathrm{j}$ of order the Eddington rate, with maximum velocity $v_\mathrm{j}$ of order the escape speed, to two spherical sectors with the jet axis perpendicular to the orbital plane, and supplies kinetic energy at the rate $\sim\dot{M}_\mathrm{j} v_\mathrm{j}^2/40$. We explore the influence of the jet on orbital evolution, envelope morphology and envelope unbinding, and assess the dependence of the results on jet mass-loss rate, launch speed, companion mass, opening angle, and whether or not subgrid accretion is turned on. In line with our theoretical estimates, we find that in all cases the jet becomes choked around the time of first periastron passage. We also find that jets lead to increases in unbound mass of up to $\sim10\%$, as compared to simulations which do not include a jet.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.