Paper detail

Ivory's Theorem revisited

Ivory's Lemma is a geometrical statement in the heart of J. Ivory's calculation of the gravitational potential of a homeoidal shell. In the simplest planar case, it claims that the diagonals of a curvilinear quadrilateral made by arcs of confocal ellipses and hyperbolas are equal. In the first part of this paper, we deduce Ivory's Lemma and its numerous generalizations from complete integrability of billiards on conics and quadrics. In the second part, we study analogs of Ivory's Lemma in Liouville and Stäckel metrics. Our main focus is on the results of the German school of differential geometry obtained in the late 19 -- early 20th centuries that might be lesser know today. In the third part, we generalize Newton's, Laplace's, and Ivory's theorems on gravitational and Coulomb potential of spheres and ellipsoids to the spherical and hyperbolic spaces. V. Arnold extended the results of Newton, Laplace, and Ivory to algebraic hypersurfaces in Euclidean space; we generalize Arnold's theorem to the spaces of constant curvature.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.