Paper detail

IVeri: Privacy-Preserving Interdomain Verification

In an interdomain network, autonomous systems (ASes) often establish peering agreements, so that one AS (agreement consumer) can influence the routing policies of the other AS (agreement provider). Peering agreements are implemented in the BGP configuration of the agreement provider. It is crucial to verify their implementation because one error can lead to disastrous consequences. However, the fundamental challenge for peering agreement verification is how to preserve the privacy of both ASes involved in the agreement. To this end, this paper presents IVeri, the first privacy-preserving interdomain agreement verification system. IVeri models the interdomain agreement verification problem as a SAT formula, and develops a novel, efficient, privacy-serving SAT solver, which uses oblivious shuffling and garbled circuits as the key building blocks to let the agreement consumer and provider collaboratively verify the implementation of interdomain peering agreements without exposing their private information. A prototype of IVeri is implemented and evaluated extensively. Results show that IVeri achieves accurate, privacy-preserving interdomain agreement verification with reasonable overhead.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.